SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39691

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
Thulasiraman – Appellant
Versus
The State rep.by – Respondent
Crl.O.P. of Crime No.71 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Mareeswaran
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Damodaran

Court may modify bail conditions when financial hardship prevents compliance with original terms.

Headnote:The petitioner approached the Court under Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, seeking modification of a bail condition imposed by the Principal Sessions Judge requiring deposit of Rs.5,00,000/-. The Court considered the petitioner's financial hardship and modified the condition to Rs.50,000/-. The Court held that bail conditions can be modified based on changed circumstances and financial inability. The final outcome is that the petition is allowed and the bail condition is modified accordingly.

Table of Content
1. background of bail grant with financial condition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's financial hardship submission. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court modifies bail condition to rs.50,000/-. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to modify the conditional order passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge at Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.3424 of 2026 order dated 29.04.2026 that the petitioner shall deposit sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate at Chennai.

2. The petitioner was earlier granted bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge at Chennai vide order dated 29.04.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.3424 of 2026. The learned Principal Sessions Judge at Chennai imposed certain conditions on the petitioner while granting bail and in one of the condition that “the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- before the II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai to the credit of Crime No.71 of 2026”.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner is in the judicial custody his family is not in the financial condition to mobilize the funds. Hence, he prayed to modify the said condition.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge at Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.3424 of 2026, dated 29.04.2026 and the same is read as follows: “the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Chennai to the credit of Crime No.71/2026”. The other conditions imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3424 of 2026, dated 29.04.2026, shall remain intact.

6. With the above modification, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top