SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39703

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
Valathar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
CRL OP(MD)No.8927 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs.A.Banumathy
For the Respondents: Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar

Anticipatory bail may be granted in pending criminal investigation with conditions to ensure compliance and judicial oversight.

Headnote:The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in relation to offences under Sections 408, 465, 468 and 420 of the IPC, alleging they obtained a loan by misrepresenting property details. Court examined the prosecution case, petitioner arguments, and public prosecutor submissions. The court primarily deals with the eligibility for anticipatory bail based on facts presented and the ongoing investigation. It framed the issue around whether the petitioners should be granted pre-arrest bail considering the pending inquiry. The petition is allowed and petitioners are ordered to be released on bail upon execution of bond with sureties along with stringent conditions.

Table of Content
1. anticipatory bail request from accused in property loan case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for and against granting anticipatory bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. bail granted with conditions on compliance and reporting. (Para 5 , 6)

The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 465, 468 & 420 of IPC, in Crime No.9 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners obtained a loan of Rs.10,50,000/- from the defacto complainant company namely Aham Housing Finance Limited by falsely representing that the property in S.No.452/6 comprised both land and a residential building and thereby created a mortgage over the said property. During SARFAESI proceedings, it was discovered that the said survey number contained only vacant land and that building was actually situated in S.No.452/7.

Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submits that investigation is pending and he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkotttai, Pudukkottai District on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) each petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), to the credit of Crime No.9 of 2026 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkotttai, Pudukkottai District. After receipt of entire amount, the learned Judicial Magistrate, shall deposit the said amount in an interest bearing Fixed Deposit in any Nationalized Bank initially for a period of one year and renew them periodically until the final order/Judgment is passed in the case in Crime No.9 of 2026. The learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court shall pass orders regarding entitlement of the said amount in its final order/Judgment.

(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. They have to co-operate for the investigation;

(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top