SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39734

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Velmurugan, C. Kumarappan, JJ
V.Bagavathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
H.C.P.(MD)No.600 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.S.Senthil Sankaranathakumar
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthilkumar

The welfare of the minor must prevail over parental claims in cases involving allegations of sexual harassment and neglect.

Headnote:The judgment concerns a habeas corpus petition filed by the petitioner to secure her 16-year-old daughter alleged to have been compelled to marry a relative. The petition was registered under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 74 and 351 of BNS and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. Upon production of the minor before the court, it was revealed that the minor had been subjected to inappropriate behavior by her stepfather and another individual. The court considered whether returning the minor to her mother was in her best interests given allegations of neglect and more serious misconduct by family members. The court also examined the appropriate legal measures to protect the minor and initiate further investigation. The habeas corpus petition was disposed of with directions to place the minor in a state-protected home, initiate proceedings under the POCSO Act, and ensure medical examination and reports.

Table of Content
1. facts of abuse allegations and registration of criminal case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court observations on welfare of minor and directions. (Para 4 , 5)
3. final court decision and orders issued. (Para 6)

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)

The petitioner, who is the mother, has filed the present habeas corpus petition to secure her daughter, viz., Ponselvi, aged 16 years and produce her before this court.

2. The petitioner is the mother of the detenue. It is alleged in the affidavit that after the demise of the petitioner's husband, the petitioner had married one Vanniraj. One Paulraj, who is the brother of the 2nd husband of the petitioner, compelled the detenue, who is aged 16 years, to marry him. Hence, the petitioner has preferred a complaint before the 2nd respondent police and a case has also been registered in Crime No.159/2026 on 09.02.2026 for offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 74 and 351 of BNS and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. It is also alleged that since the said Paulraj threatened them, there is a danger to their life.

3. When the matter came up for hearing today, the detenue was secured and produced before this Court. She has stated that since the 2nd husband of the petitioner has misbehaved with her, she informed the same to the police. However, the police did not take any action against them. She had also stated that she is in love with the said Paulraj, who is the brother of her step father, which is a prohibited relationship. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Vanniraj/step father also sexually harassed the detenue. It is also alleged that Paulraj had also misbehaved with the detenue.

4. From the statement made by the detenue, it is seen that the detenue had informed the above happenings to the petitioner/mother. However, the mother adviced the detenue to adjust. Under these circumstances, if the detenue is sent along with her mother, it is against the interest and welfare of the detenue. Therefore, the respondent police are directed to keep the detenue in Muthukuviyal Home for Children, 176, Muthumalai Building, Maninagar 2nd street, Tuticorin 628003.

5. The respondent police shall also take steps to register a case against the said Paulraj and Vanniraj under the provisions of POCSO Act. The respondent police is also directed to produce the detenue before the medical board for medical examination and a report shall be obtained and thereafter the detenue shall be sent to home.

6. With the above direction, the Habeas Corpus Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top