Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
Adaikkan – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus to quash refusal of permission for religious festival (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. government advocate suggests restraint on petitioner from collection of thalaikattu vari (Para 4) |
| 3. writ petition is allowed while restraining collection of contributions (Para 6 , 7) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.05.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.Crl.(MD) No.655 and 656 of 2026 Adaikkan ... Petitioner Vs
1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.Murugesan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent herein in his proceedings in C.No.32/H1PS/2026 dated 01.05.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1 and 2 respondents herein to grant permission to conduct the Chithira Pournami Urchava Vizha festival of Sri Selva Vinayagar and Sri Devi Karumaariyamman Temple located at Surve
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
