SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
Aboobacker Siddiqe – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In – Respondent
Crime No.47 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah
For the Respondents: Mr.A.S.Abdul Kallam Azad

Anticipatory bail granted in non-serious offence based on discharge from hospital and no criminal antecedents.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioners face allegations under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 126, 118(1), and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Facts of the Case: A land dispute led to a verbal altercation and physical assault between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. Findings of the Court: The Court granted anticipatory bail considering the facts, the injured being discharged, and absence of previous cases.

Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted anticipatory bail given that they apprehend arrest in connection with alleged offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court, in granting anticipatory bail, imposed conditions ensuring the petitioners abide by the law, do not tamper with evidence, and report to the police as required.

Result: The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail subject to executing bonds with sureties and complying with other conditions.

Table of Content
1. application for anticipatory bail based on alleged offences. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments by both sides on granting of bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court grants anticipatory bail subject to imposed conditions. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 126, 118(1), 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute, there was wordy altercation between the petitioners and the defacto complainant and there was physical assault by the accused. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchili, Virudhunagar, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required;

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top