SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39937

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
B.MADHUKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY (UNION TERRITORY) – Respondent



##PAGE1##

WP No. 11779 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026

CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

WP No. 11779 of 2026 and WMP.No.12857 of 2026

B.Madhukumar S/o.B.Vijaya Mohan Rao

No.6-6-134, New Rajeev Nagar Colony Farampeta, Yanam

Puducherry 533464.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Government of Puducherry (Union Territory)

Represented by its Secretary Home Department

Puducherry.

2. The Senior Superintendent of Police Head Quarters, Puducherry.

3. The Special Officer (Police)

Police Department Puducherry.

4. The Deputy Tahsildar Cum Executive Magistrate Yanam

Puducherry.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the notice dated 25.02.206 issued by the Special Officer (Police Department) Puducherry, the 3rd respondent herein and quash the same and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to accept the caste certificate issued to the petitioner 13.08.2025 for the appointment of the petitioner to the post of

__________

Page1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/05/2026 01:43:14 pm )

##PAGE2##

WP No. 11779 of 2026

Police constable, under Notification No.237/ESTT 1(B)/Rectt/PC/A1/25 and pass orders (Prayer amended as per order dated 02.04.2026 in WMP.No.14531

of 2026 in W.P.No.11779 of 2026).

For Petitioner: Mr.A.V.Arun

For Respondents: M/s.G.Djearany Government Advocate (Pondy)

for R1 ro R4

ORDER

The writ petitioner has been filed seeking the following relief :

“ To call for the records relating to the notice dated

25.02.206 issued by the Special Officer (Police Department) Puducherry, the 3rd respondent herein and quash the same and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to accept the caste certificate issued to the petitioner 13.08.2025 for the appointment of the petitioner to the post of Police constable, under Notification

No.237/ESTT 1(B)/Rectt/PC/A1/25 and pass orders.”

2. The petitioner is a native of Yanam, Union Territory of Puducherry. He

belonged to Scheduled Caste community. The 3rd respondent vide notification dated 12.08.2025 had called for recruitment of Police Constable and the petitioner had applied for the same. The petitioner had successfully cleared the written examination and physical fitness test. The petitioner who was provisionally selected, was asked to submit his certificate/document for

__________

Page2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/05/2026 01:43:14 pm )

##PAGE3##

WP No. 11779 of 2026

verification, including the community certificate. During certificate verification, the petitioner had submitted the caste certificate issued by the 4th respondent on 13.08.2025. The 3rd respondent had insisted the petitioner to obtain a fresh

community certificate from the Taluk Office for processing his candidature.

3. When the petitioner approached the 4th respondent for issuing a fresh

community certificate, he was informed that there is no time limit prescribed for the validity of the certificate and that the certificate issued by them on 13.8.2025 holds good. This has also been communicated to the 3rd respondent in writing by the 4th respondent on 24.02.2026, despite which, the 3rd vide his letter dated 25.02.2026, required the petitioner to obtain a fresh original certificate on or before 03.03.2026, failing which, his provisional selection would be cancelled. Thereafter, the petitioner had sought 10 days time for production of fresh caste certificate, from the 3rd respondent and yet again approached the 4th respondent, who had turned down the request of the petitioner, reiterating there

is no need to issue a duplicate community certificate.

4. In this circumstances, the petitioner left with no other alternative, had

filed the present writ petition seeking above relief.

5. Heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials

available on record.

__________

Page3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/05/2026 01:43:14 p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top