SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 40078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Vellaichamy D – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner – Respondent


BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 08.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.9648 of 2026 D.Vellaichamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Virudhunagar.

3.The Tahsildar, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Special Tashildar, Temple Lands, Virudhunagar.

5.The Fit-Person, Arulmigu Ayyanar Temple Kariapatti, Virudhunagar District, Rep by the Executive Officer, Arulmighu Chokkanatha Swamy Temple Virudhunagar. ...Respondents Writ Petitions are filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 4 and 5 to implement the communication issued by the 2nd respondent in Na.ka.No. 412/2024/Aa2 dated 18.03.2025, whereby the authorities were instructed to conduct a field inspection with the assistance of the Tahsildar/3rd respondent and identify the encroachments over the temple property and on receipt of report or complaint thereof, direct the 1st respondent to initiate proceedings under Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top