SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 40084

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


DATED: 09-04-2026


THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI


CRP No. 2046 of 2026

AND CMP NO. 9082 OF 2026


1. K.Gopal S/O. Kannan, No.11, Barathi Nagar

Extention, Near Bharathi Nagar Park, Thiruverkadu, Chennai - 600077.

Petitioner(s)


Vs


1. K.Jayaprakash Narayanan S/O. Kannan, No.14/6, Madam II

Street, Dr.Alagappa Chettiyar Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600084.

2.R.Ramesh No.14/6, Madam II Street, Dr.Alagappa

Chettiyar Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600084.

3.R.Umamageshwari No.14/6, Madam II Street, Dr.Alagappa

Chettiyar Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600084.

Respondent(s)


For Petitioner(s): MR.Ch.Paranjothi

For Respondent(s):

PRAYER

To set aside the order and decreetal order passed by the Learned XXIV Asst.City Civil Court, Chennai in IA.No.6 of 2026 in OS.No.88 of 2022 dated 03-03-2026 and allow the CRP.

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order and decreetal order passed by the Learned XXIV Asst.City Civil Court, Chennai in IA.No.6 of 2026 in OS.No.88 of 2022.

2. The petitioner herein filed under order XIII rule 4 of the civil procedure code seeking to allow the petitioner/1st defendant to mark the family arrangement deed/partition dated 30.08.2010 as evidence. Upon hearing both sides, the Trial court dismissed the application by stating that unregistered and unstamped document cannot be admitted as evidence in view of embargo in Section 17 of Indian Registration Act, and Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed this Civil Revision Petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though it is an unregistered document it can be used for collateral purpose. Further registration is not compulsory with regard to the unregistered family arrangement deed but without considering the above the Trial Court dismissed the application. Hence, he prays to allow this petitioner

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. On a perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner had filed the application seeking to mark the family arrangement deed/partition deed dated 30.08.2010 as evidence, in order to establish that a family arrangement had already taken place among the family members and that they had been enjoying the property accordingly. However, the Trial Court dismissed the application on the ground that the document was unregistered and therefore inadmissible in evidence. This Court is of the view that an unregistered document may be looked into for collateral purposes, particularly for the limited purpose of showing possession and enjoyment of the property subject proof. To that extent, the said document can be considered along with the other oral and documentary evidence available on record. Further, the validity, admissibility, and genuineness of the document are matters to be decided only after the completion of a full-fledged trial. Hence, the order passed by the Trial Court in I.A no. 6 of 2026 in OS No. 88 of 2022 is set aside. I.A No. 6 of 2026 is allowed.

6. In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No Costs. Pending petition, if any, is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top