IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
Prasanth – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karungalpalayam, Erode District – Respondent
CRL OP No. 8824 of 2026|CRL MP No. 6263 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and summary of the prosecution's allegations regarding the minor victim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. verification of subsequent marriage and current marital status of the parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
Erode.
(Crime No.383 of 2022)
3. Sri Lekha Selvam
4. Saranya ..Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in Spl.S.C.No.49 of 2024 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Fast
Track Mahila Court, Erode and quash the same.
For Petitioner: Mr. M. Devaraj
For Respondents: Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor
assisted by Ms. T. Harshana for R1 and R2
__________
Page1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/05/2026 02:05:16 pm )
CRL OP No. 8824 of 2026
O R D E R
The petitioner/accused, who is facing trial in Spl.S.C.No.49 of 2024 for
offences under Sections 5(j)(ii) and 6 of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act 2012 , Section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(va) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 and Sections 366, 344 and 376(3) of IPC, before the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court,
Erode, has filed this Criminal Original Petition on the ground of compromise.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the 4th respondent was living with
her mother and completed her 12th standard. On 13.06.2021, she secretly married the petitioner, but continued to reside in their respective homes. Subsequently, she became pregnant and informed the petitioner; upon examination at a Primary Health Centre, she was found to be eight months pregnant. On that day, the victim was 17 years old. Hence, based on the information received from the Erode Child line Project Coordinator, the police registered a case. The investigation has now been completed and a charge sheet
has been filed listing 23 witnesses.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner and
the 4th respondent are husband and wife, who got legally married on 26.04.2024
__________
Page2 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/05/2026 02:05:16 pm )
CRL OP No. 8824 of 2026
and their marriage was registered on 06.11.2025. It was further submitted that a second male baby was born to them on 26.09.2025 and they are now leading a
happy marital life. Hence, he prays for quashing.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the
respondents 1 and 2 submitted that, during the relevant period, the victim was a minor and her date of birth is 28.06.2005. The victim was examined by the Doctor. It was further submitted that the victim gave birth to a second male baby on 26.09.2025. The 1st respondent Police also enquired and found from
the neighbours that they are living as husband and wife happily.
5. This Court has considered the rival submissions and perused the
materials available on record, including the affidavits filed by the petitioner and the 4th respondent, the joint compromise memo, the marriage registration
certificate and the birth certificate of baby.
6. Today the petitioner and the 4th respondent appeared before this Court
and their identities were confirmed by the 2nd respondent Police. During interaction, the 4th respondent/victim informed that she attained majority, both the petitioner and the 4th respondent/victim are living as husband and wife and
they were blessed with a 2nd male baby on 26.09.2025.
__________
Page3 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/05/2026 02:05:16 pm )
CRL OP No. 8824 of 2026
7. The joint compromise memo is extracted hereunder: “The petitioner states that the Final report has been
filed against the petitioner for the alleged offence under section 5(1)(ii),6,9, of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act 2012 , section 3(1)(W)(i) and 3(2)(va) of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015, 366, 344, 376(3) IPC in special SC No.49 of 2024, on the file of the Sessions
Judge, Fa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.