Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mohammed Shaffiq, J
DHANASEKARAN CV – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Director General – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for reward grant based on information provided (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court directs time-bound consideration of reward claim (Para 4 , 5) |
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to grant the reward to the petitioner to the tune of 20 percent on the differential duty amount of Rs. 8,78,67,740/- (Rupees Eight Crores Seventy Eight Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty Only) recovered as per the terms of CBIC Circular No.20/2015 dated 31.07.2015.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.Saran Prasad For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Santhanaraman Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to grant the reward to the petitioner to the tune of 20 percent on the differential duty amount of Rs.8,78,67,740/- (Rupees Eight Crores Seventy Eight Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Forty Only) recovered as per the terms of CBIC Circular No.20/2015 dated 31.07.2015.
2. XYZ informant/ petitioner name not disclosed in view of the apprehensions expressed by the learned counsel for petitioner. It is submitted by the lea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
