Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mohammed Shaffiq, J
K.ARUMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to challenge the denial of appointment approval. (Para 1) |
| 2. previous order confirms no prior permission required for non-teaching posts. (Para 2 , 3) |
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated
27.06.2023 whereby the petitioner's appointment to the post of Watchman was denied by referring to surplus staff working in other Schools.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was appointed in the sanctioned post in the 4th respondent School and thus entitled for approval of appointment and the surplus staff working in other schools cannot be a reason for denying approval of appointment of the petitioner.
3. It is submitted that the above denial is on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.238 dated 13.11.2018. The said G.O. was the subject matter of challenge in W.P.No.14706 of 2022, whereby direction was issued to approve the appointment of the petitioner therein as Office Assistant. The aforesaid writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 31.01.2024, wherein it was held as under:
“6. As per Rule 15(4) of the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulations) Act 1973, no prior permission is r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
