Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
S.GUNDUMANI – Appellant
Versus
THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the writ petition and petitioner’s case (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments by respondent on deferment and pending charges (Para 4) |
| 3. service rules and precedents on deferring promotions (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court’s analysis on legality of deferment (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final disposition with directions (Para 9) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent and for a consequential direction to the respondent herein to confirm the petitioner’s promotion order passed by the respondent during the year 2020-2021.
2. Heard Mr.A.Ganesan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Surendran, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade II in Transport Department through Tamil Nadu Public service Commission by way of direct Recruitment on 18.11.2016 and posted in the office of the RTO, Krishnagiri on 03.02.2017. The petitioner had undergone the training as prescribed and his probation was declared and service regularised. Though the petitioner was promoted under Section 47 of the Act after qualifying for promotion for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
