Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, B.PUGALENDHI, JJ
Rajaji M – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition under article 226 of constitution of india. (Para 1) |
| 2. dispensation of notice to private respondents. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner complaining of encroachment in varied survey numbers. (Para 3) |
| 4. survey numbers classified as "vari" and "kanmoi". (Para 4) |
| 5. survey ordered and removal of encroachment directed. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4.
2. Issuance of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.
3. The writ petitioner is a resident of Papankulam Village in Thiruchuzhi Taluk. He complains that in the petition mentioned survey numbers, there are encroachments.
4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the petition mentioned survey numbers have been classified as “vari” and kanmoi”.
5. We direct the second respondent to conduct survey after issuing notice to all the interested persons including the petitioner herein. Once encroachment is confirmed, action will be taken under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act to have the same to be removed. The entire exercise shall be c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
