Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
M. Muhammad Bilal – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station – Salem Town, Salem City, Salem District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of case involving sexual offence allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. marriage and compromise as grounds to quash. (Para 4) |
| 3. quashing justified as abuse of process after marriage. (Para 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioner who is an accused in Spl.S.C.No.114 of 2025, facing trial for offences under Sections 5(1), 6 of the Protection of Child From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 66E of Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 366 and 506(i) IPC before the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO Act, Salem, has filed this Criminal Original Petition.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was a minor girl studying in 11th standard at Government Higher Secondary School, Salem. During that time, she became acquainted with the petitioner, and they developed a relationship. It is alleged that on 12.12.2023, the petitioner took the victim to his house and had sexual intercourse with her. It is further alleged that the accused took intimate photographs and recorded videos of the victim. Subsequently, when the victim resisted and refused to continue the relationship, the accused threatened her with dire consequences by using such m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
