Rama.Lakshmanan vs Kasi Naattukottai Nagara Chathiram

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1389

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Rama.Lakshmanan – Appellant
Versus
Kasi Naattukottai Nagara Chathiram – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Meenakshi Sundaram
For the Respondent: Mr. H. Lakshmi Shankar for Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan

Table of Content
1. facts of the case including background and plaintiff's nomination dispute with the society. (Para 2 , 4)
2. the importance of reasoned orders when vacating interim orders and taking note of subsequent events. (Para 13 , 15)
3. a suit becomes infructuous when the impugned order has been withdrawn by the defendant. (Para 17)
4. constitution of an independent committee to conduct an enquiry to ensure justice is done. (Para 20)

ORDER :

V. Lakshminarayanan, J.

Heard Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram for the petitioner and Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar representing Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan for the respondents.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants. This revision is at the instance of the plaintiff.

3. The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff intended to participate in an election to be conducted for the Management Committee members of the first defendant Society. The first defendant Society is a pre-eminent charitable institution consisting exclusively of members of Naattukkottai Nagarathar Community. They have been running charities in several places across the country and most particularly, performing yeoman service to Shree Viswanatha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1389

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTV.LAKSHMINARAYANANRama.Lakshmanan – AppellantVersusKasi Naattukottai Nagara Chathiram – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Rama.Lakshmanan – Appellant
Versus
Kasi Naattukottai Nagara Chathiram – Respondent