Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, J
P.R.SRIDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review filed to reconsider mandamus for appointment based on integrated law degree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim that integrated b.a. b.l. degree qualifies for degree requirement of revenue assistant. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. previous dismissal on ground that integrated degree cannot be split into b.a. and b.l. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. government order equates b.a. law after three years to normal undergraduate degree. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. respondents failed to disclose relevant g.o. and wrongly rejected qualification. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. court recalls order and finds review applicant qualified based on g.o. equivalence. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. mandamus issued to appoint petitioner as revenue assistant in four weeks. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
This review application has been filed seeking to revisit an order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 6855 of 2025.
2. The petitioner therein is review applicant. The Writ Petition had been filed seeking a Mandamus directing the respondents therein to select and appoint the petitioner to any one of the posts advertised vide notification No.7 of 2015 dated 30.04.2015, specifically by taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was qualified wi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
