Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
D.Palaniyappan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleading necessary parties for complete adjudication (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge to individual patta granted without consent (Para 3) |
| 3. direction to consider representation with enquiry (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. prohibition of sale without partition and consent (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This Court suo-motu impleads as Periyakaruppan, S/o.Subbaiah, Sirathakudi Neivagal Panchayat, K.Pallivasal Post, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District and Subbaiah, S/o.Karupppaiah, Sirathakudi Neivagal Panchayat K.Pallivasal Post, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. as
8th and 9th respondents.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the Petitioner's Representation dated 28.04.2023 filed as against the alleged individual Patta No. 280 for the undivided ancestral properties issued for the land located in Survey Nos. 19/7B, 18/3-A2, 28/5A, 29/1, and 80/6A, situated at Seerathakudi Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District, and cancel the same, and register it as per the Patta No.159 document as it stood before individual Patta No. 280, within the time stipulated by this Court..
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issuance of indivi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
