Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
Krupakar Murali Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
Superintend Engineer Tangedco – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disconnection without notice and ignoring fir findings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. fair concession by respondents and court rationale (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. final directions for restoration (Para 5) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the 3rd respondent pertaining to their order dated 21.11.2025 in Proceedings No.Ka. No.Use Po/ E. Pe / West / Gobi/ Ko. Accident / No.357/2025 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to restore the petitioner Electricity Connection No. 310 -011-8TF IV.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is managing his agricultural land in Gobichettipalayam following the demise of his predecessor. The electricity connection (EB No.310-011-8TF IV) to the land was disconnected without any prior notice. Further, he would submit that on 15.10.2024, a male elephant named Makna died and was found on the Petitioner’s land. Subsequently, the 3rd respondent disconnected the power supply, alleging unauthorized battery fencing. However the FIR dated 17.10.2024 clearly established that the illegal fencing was installed by the adjacent landowners, which led to elephant’s death. Despite the forest Ranger’s l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
