Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Kameswari Malliga Sindhu – Appellant
Versus
Venkatraman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of revision petition seeking interim maintenance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' conflicting claims regarding wife's income. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. no proof of wife's independent income; maintenance due. (Para 6) |
| 4. revision petition allowed; enhanced interim maintenance granted. (Para 8) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in IA No.3 of 2023 in OP No.5432 of 2022 dated 30.04.2024 on the file of the V Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai, the revision petitioner / wife has preferred this revision petition.
2. The revision petitioner / wife filed an application seeking to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the petitioner and Rs.30,000/- to the minor child namely, Ameyaa for their monthly maintenance and also direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.55,000/- per year towards the school fees of the minor child. On hearing both sides, the trial judge has awarded only a sum of Rs.30,000/- as maintenance to the minor child and also directed the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.55,000/- as educational expenses in respect of interim maintenance. Aggrieved over the same, the revision petitioner / wife has preferred this revision petition.
3. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
