Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
M/s. Thiashola Estate – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund commissioner II – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's order dismissing restoration petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts of financial distress and pre-deposit condition (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioners' contention for allowing restoration (Para 5) |
| 4. court's consideration of facts and grant of opportunity (Para 7) |
| 5. restoration of appeals and allowance of writ petitions (Para 8) |
ORDER
By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Since the issue involved in these writ petitions are one and the same, these writ petitions are heard together and are disposed of by way of this common order.
3. These petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 26.03.2026 passed by the CGIT, Chennai in EPFA Nos. 251/2025 & 235 of 2025, quash the same and direct the Appellate Tribunal to restore the EPFA Nos.251/2025 & 235 of 2025 respectively to its file and dispose of the appeal on merits.
4. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners are covered under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The petitioners suffered severe financial distress and non payment of EPF dues, the respondent passed an order dated 15.05.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
