IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M Dhandapani, J
P.MUTHAN PERUMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of tenure. (Para 1 , 2) |
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition has been filed challenging the appointment of non-hereditary trustees. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the tenure of two years has already expired. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.