SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 40603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M Dhandapani, J
P.MUTHAN PERUMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.Srikanth
For the Respondents: Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan for R1 to R4 & R10 Special Government Pleader Mr.D.Raghu for R5 to R9

Table of Content
1. writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of tenure. (Para 1 , 2)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition has been filed challenging the appointment of non-hereditary trustees. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, the tenure of two years has already expired. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top