Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund, Rep.by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II – Appellant
Versus
Teknoturf Info Services Pvt Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal filed challenging maintainability order against pf authorities in epf matter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tribunal orders not final; epf board as body corporate has constitutional right to seek judicial review under article 226. (Para 4) |
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Writ Appeal has been instituted challenging the order made in W.P.No.34029 of 2019 dated 25.02.2025.
2. Since there is no appearance for the respondent in the writ petition as well as in the writ appeal, this Court is inclined to pass orders.
3. The issues raised are no more res integra and covered by an earlier judgment passed by this Court in W.A.No.836 of 2026, dated 09.04.2026. The relevant portions of the judgment is extracted hereunder, ….
“6. Though in the present cases, appellate authority has passed an order on enquiry under Section 14B of the Act, it cannot be said that in the event of the said order is reversed by the Appellate Tribunal, no further challenge could be made before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the said arguments is accepted, in all cases, in the event of the order of the Original Authority is reversed on appeal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
