Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
M.Paulpandian – Appellant
Versus
Project Implementation Director PUI - Kancheepuram, National Highways Authority Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nhai eviction order for acquired highway land challenged (Para 1) |
| 2. parties contest title after statutory land acquisition (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. post-acquisition sale deed held illegal and void (Para 4) |
| 4. no rights from purchase made after acquisition (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed for lack of merit (Para 7) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The order dated 07.10.2024 passed by the National Highways Authority of India asking the petitioner to vacate the National Highways property is under challenge.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that patta stood in the name of the vendor to the petitioner, and subsequently, the name was transferred to the name of the petitioner. Therefore, petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject property. Thus, impugned order passed by the National Highways Authority of India is infirm and to be set aside.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the National Highways Authority of India would submit that the subject lands Varadharajapuram Village, Poonamalle Taluk, Tiruvallur District for widening of Poonamalle-Walajahpet Section, NH-48, (Old NH No.4) was acquired by invoking the provisions of the National Hig
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
