Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan, JJ
H.Mohammad Mourice – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. statement of facts and common judgment (Para 1) |
| 2. hearing of parties and counsel involved (Para 2) |
| 3. submission by appellants and prosecution on bail (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. facts relating to arrest and previous proceedings (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. discussion on supreme court rulings on arrest (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. conclusion of the court granting bail (Para 11 , 13) |
A common order is passed in these two criminal appeals since the facts arising for consideration as well as legal issues are common, and since both the appellants are co-accused in a charge sheet filed on 15.11.2024 in Crime No.173 of 2024 involving offences under Sections 34, 120B, 153A, and 153B of IPC and Sections 13 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (in short ‘UAPA’).
2. We have heard Mr.I.Abdul Basith, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
3. The submissions on behalf of the Appellants are that the chargesheet as above related to a total of seven accused, bail was rejected only in the cases of A2, A4 and A5, that the Appellants have not been furnished the grounds of arrest till date which violates the principles of natural justi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
