Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J
AMALIN – Appellant
Versus
A.K. NALINI DEVI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. purpose of quash petition under section 482 crpc (Para 1) |
| 2. maintainability of quash petition after trial commencement (Para 2 , 3) |
ORDER
This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in CC.No.1688 of 2016 on the file of the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai.
2. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 & 3 submitted that already trial has been commenced and now the case has been posted for arguments.
3. Therefore, after commencement of trial, this quash petition cannot be maintainable. As such, this criminal original petition is liable to be dismissed.
4. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
