Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J
SUNDERRAJAN – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision filed against trial court order dismissing appointment of commissioner (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff seeks to prove property features and measurement through commissioner (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent opposes appointment of advocate commissioner (Para 4) |
| 4. court finds opportunity must be given to plaintiff to prove case by all means (Para 5) |
| 5. order set aside; revision petition allowed (Para 6) |
ORDER
Challenging the order passed in I.A.No.286 of 2019 in O.S.No.37 of 2019, the plaintiff has preferred the above revision.
2. Before the trial Court, the revision petitioner/plaintiff filed an application in I.A.No.286 of 2019 to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to measure the property with the help of Surveyor and the same was dismissed by the trial Court holding that the plaintiff has to prove his case on his own records and not by collecting the evidence through the Advocate Commissioner. Aggrieved by the order, the plaintiff has preferred the above revision.
3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff submits that before the trial court, the plaintiff filed a suit for injunction against Government Officials, the defendants 1 to 4, stating that the property wa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
