IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
C.Maragatham – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development – Respondent
Writ Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and petitioner's contention regarding housing allotment (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
ORDER
By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider petitioners representation dated 26.04.2025 for allotment of tenement in the Pattinapakkam Scheme.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that he belongs to fisherman community and living near Marina Beach Area. He has no house in his name. So, she had applied for a tenement in the 2nd respondent Board. Since he was not given any tenement in the Tsunami Scheme, he had sent several representations as well as application under RTI to the 2nd respondent and subsequently, she had sent representation dated 26.04.2025 to the 1st respondent, who is the nodal authority for housing for all scheme. But, so far, there is no action on his representation. Hence, he seeks a direction.
4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.04.2025 and pass appropriate orders on own merit and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.