Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
C.KANNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. temple administration and control of temple funds (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. request to consider representation within time frame (Para 3) |
| 3. court direction to statutory authority (Para 5) |
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.03.2026 and to direct the respondents to appoint Fit Person for A/m.Shri Aadhisakthi Mutharamman Thirukoil, Otteri, Chennai - 600012 in the light of the order passed by the 2nd respondent herein in O.A.No.4 of 2024 order dated 06.01.2026.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Velmurugan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE)
for R1
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.03.2026 and to direct the respondents to appoint Fit Person for A/m.Shri Aadhisakthi Mutharamman Thirukoil, Otteri, Chennai - 600012 in the light of the order passed by the 2nd respondent herein in O.A.No.4 of 2024 order dated 06.01.2026.
2.The petitioner states that A/m.Shri Aadhisakthi Mutharamman Thirukoil, Otteri, Chennai – 600012 was founded
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
