Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
MANIKANDAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR / – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of writ petition facts and challenged order. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents submission on changed circumstances. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition dismissed for becoming infructuous. (Para 3) |
Order
This Writ Petition is filed against the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dated 25.12.2022, whereby the Cheque signing power of the petitioner in his capacity as Vice President has been restricted and conferred the same to the 6th respondent.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that now the panchayat union is presently not managing the affairs of the local body. It was further submitted that a Special Officer has been appointed to administer the affairs of the local body and therefore, the relief sought in the writ petition cannot be entertained as it has become infructuous.
3.Recording the submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SK To
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
