SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 40969

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
MALLIGA NAGAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Dharani
For the Respondents: Mr. Prasad Vijayakumar, SPC for R1 & R4 Mr. F.B. Benjamin George for R3 & R6 Mr.M.Rajendran, AGP for R2 & R5

Court may direct public authorities to consider applications and representations within a reasonable time.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the loan application filed under the Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP). The petitioner applied for a loan on 06.05.2023, made representations on 07.11.2023 and 30.11.2023, but no orders were passed. The court found it appropriate to direct the third respondent to dispose of the loan application on merits and in accordance with law. The court framed the issue as to whether direction should be issued to direct the respondents to consider the loan application of the petitioner within a reasonable time. The court observed that the respondents shall consider the application and dispose of it without any delay. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider and dispose of the loan application in accordance with law, within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. court may direct disposal of pending loan application within reasonable time (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent herein to issue appropriate direction to the third respondent herein to sanction loan to the petitioner under PMEGP, by considering the petitioner’s online application dated 06.05.2023 (No. DITN236979- 11678170) and as per the recommendation of the second respondent in his letter dated 12.06.2023 and in the light of PMEGP score board dated 12.06.2023 in the matter and in the light of the representation dated 07.11.2023 and reminder dated 30.11.2023 of the petitioner and further to direct the fourth respondent to consider and take necessary action on the complaint dated 07.11.2023 and reminder dated

30.11.2023 of the petitioner, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has made an application for loan under the Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) and he made several representations in this regard, however till date, no order has been passed on the said application and hence, the present Writ Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that the loan application of the petitioner will be considered by the respondents on merits and in accordance with law and sought time for the respondents to pass appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the loan application of the petitioner dated 06.05.2023 and to dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top