SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 40972

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA – Appellant
Versus
THE COLLECTOR OF COIMBATORE – Respondent
W.M.P.Nos.9077, 9078, 9079 and 9080 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Kamalanathan
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Murthi for R1, R4 and R5, Mr.Meganathan for R2 and R3, Mr.C.R.Prasannan for R6

Court grants liberty to file fresh application after disposal of related suit without expressing opinion on merits.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari. Facts of the Case: The petitioner Church sought permission for additional construction in S.No.1276/3, Kalapatty Village, which was granted on 30.01.2010. A suit (O.S.No.1378 of 2011) challenging the permission is pending before the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

Findings of Court:
The Court refrains from expressing any opinion on the merits and grants liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application after disposal of the suit.

Issues: Whether the impugned letter dated 16.06.2023 issued by the Collector quashing the construction permission should be quashed.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, grants liberty to the petitioner to make fresh application for construction after disposal of the suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Table of Content
1. background and parties' submissions on construction permission and pending suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court review of records showing granted permission and pending suit. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court grants liberty for fresh application after suit disposal. (Para 7 , 8)

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari to quash the letter No.25818/2019/E2 dated

16.06.2023 issued by the first respondent as illegal.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner Church is the owner of the property in S.No.1276/3 (Old S.No.155/2), Kalapatty Village, Coimbatore North Taluk and the Church sought permission to put up additional building in the said land and the first respondent after verifying the land record and after due enquiry granted permission vide proceedings dated 30.01.2010. Whileso, third parties namely, Devarajan and Duraisamy filed a suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif Court, Coimbatore seeking to declare the order of the first respondent dated 30.01.2010 as improper and for permanent injunction on the ground that construction of Church in the outskirts of Mariamman Temple is solely for the purpose of conversion and that it may lead to communal tension. Thereafter, the first respondent sent the impugned letter to the fourth respondent requesting to take necessary action to stop the construction works till the disposal of the suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that perusal of the written statement filed by the first defendant therein/ first respondent makes it clear that the available Village accounts reveal that Mariamman Temple and CSI Church are located in two different survey numbers i.e., 1271/2 and 1276/3 respectively and inbetween these two fields there is a road running and the survey number of the road is 1275. Hence, no law and order problem will arise if the construction is made by the petitioner. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the sixth respondent submitted the sixth respondent is the District Secretary of Hindu Munnani, Coimbatore North District and further submitted that already a suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011 seeking to declare the order of the first respondent dated 30.01.2010 as improper and for permanent injunction is pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. Hence, this Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to make fresh application for construction after disposal of O.S.No.1378 of 2011.

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Perusal of records reveal that the petitioner Church sought permission to put up additional building in S.No.1276/3 (Old S.No.155/2), Kalapatty Village, Coimbatore North Taluk and the first respondent granted permission vide proceedings dated 30.01.2010. The records further reveal that a suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011 seeking to declare the order of the first respondent dated 30.01.2010 as improper and for permanent injunction is pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

7.In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, since expressing any opinion will adversely affect the interest of the parties in the suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011, and without interfering with the impugned letter of the first respondent dated 16.06.2023, grants liberty to the petitioner to make fresh application for construction after disposal of the suit in O.S.No.1378 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

8.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top