IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
Chief Executive Railway Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
K.Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
With the consent of both parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The present intra-Court appeals have been instituted against the interim order dated 25.02.2026 passed in W.M.P.Nos.52588, 52604, 52617 & 52673 of 2025 in W.P.Nos.15548, 15555, 15551 & 15579 of 2025.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would mainly contend that the applications seeking interim orders were allowed without hearing the appellant. The matter was listed and the appellant was informed about the order after the Court hearing and therefore, they could not defend their case on the interim relief.
4. At the outset, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the order was passed without hearing the appellant and thus, an opportunity is to be afforded to the appellant to defend their case.
5. The learned counsel for the respondents could not able to deny the said facts. Thus, this Court is inclined to remand the matter back.
Thus, the common interim order dated 25.02.2026 passed in W.M.P.Nos.52588, 52604, 52617 & 52673 of 2025 in W.P.Nos.15548, 15555, 15551 & 15579 of 2025 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the writ Court for fresh adjudicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.