SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41090

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Murali Shankar, J
The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
V.Karuppasamy – Respondent
C.M.P.(MD)No.2348 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.9676 of 2025 and C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.9676 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No appearance
For the Respondents: No appearance for R2 to R4 R1 – Dismissed as abated

Non-appearance of parties at hearing leads to dismissal of delay condonation petition and rejection of related appeal at SR stage.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition involves Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, which permits filing of an appeal with condonation of delay. Facts: Appellant sought condonation of 63 days delay in filing an appeal against an award dated 05.07.2024. Findings: Court observed that despite multiple adjournments, there was no representation for the petitioner, leading to the dismissal for default.

Issues: Whether the delay should be condoned despite non-appearance of the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: Court held that non-appearance and lack of representation justify dismissal for default.

Result: Both the petition and the appeal stand dismissed/rejected.

Table of Content
1. repeated non-appearance justifies dismissal for default. (Para 1 , 2)

COMMON ORDER

The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 63 days in preferring the appeal, challenging the award dated 05.07.2024 passed in M.C.O.P.No.69 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional Subordinate Court, Tenkasi.

2. It is seen from the records that since there was no representation for the petitioner on 09.04.2026 and subsequently on 21.04.2026, this Court ordered to post the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 29.04.2026 and even today (29.04.2026), there is no representation for the petitioner as well as the respondents 2 to 4. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed for default. Consequently, C.M.A.

(MD)SR.No.9676 of 2025 stands rejected at the SR stage itself.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top