SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L. Victoria Gowri, J
Bindhu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition|Crl.M.P.No.3244 of 2025|Crime No.62 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Navas Shareef
For the Respondents: Mr.S.S.Manoj

Where vehicle value may deteriorate, interim custody may be granted subject to conditions despite ongoing NDPS proceedings.

Headnote:The petitioner sought revision of the denial of interim custody of her vehicle seized under the NDPS Act. The Court held that prolonged custody without cause would lead to vehicle deterioration and serve no purpose. The revision was allowed upon execution of bond, production of RC, undertaking, and monthly production conditions. The order balances public interest with preservation of property value. The Court framed whether a vehicle seized for NDPS violation could be released to its owner pending confiscation proceedings. Ratio decidendi rests on the principle that property rights imply interim custody where retention does not prejudice investigation or trial. The reasoning emphasizes avoidance of loss in value and grants interim release conditioned on safeguards. The Criminal Revision Petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 15.09.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.3244 of 2025 is set aside. The vehicle TN 39 DE 7143 is ordered to be returned for interim custody subject to conditions.

Table of Content
1. seizure under ndps and dismissal of interim custody petition (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments for and against interim release of vehicle (Para 5 , 6)
3. court allows interim custody with conditions to prevent deterioration (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order of the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, in Crl.M.P.No. 3244 of 2025 dated 15.09.2025 filed by the petitioner under Section 497 of BNSS of 2023.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent filed an FIR in Crime No.62 of 2025 for an alleged offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 29(1) and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for illegal transport of drugs through Two Wheeler KTM Duke bearing registration No.TN 39 DE 7143. Subsequently, the petitioner's vehicle was seized. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.3244 of 2025 for the return of vehicle before the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, and the same was dismissed on 15.09.2025.

3. The petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 15.09.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No. 3244 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, and to set aside the same.

4. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that if the vehicle is returned to the petitioner, there is possibility for the vehicle being used for the commission of similar offence and objected to grant interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the vehicle bearing Registration No. TN 39 DE 7143 is owned by the petitioner and he was not involved in any such offence as alleged by the respondent and if the vehicle is kept in open place, the vehicle will get deteriorated and the value of the vehicle would automatically stand diminished and therefore interim custody of the vehicle may be granted to the petitioner.

7. Considering the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and that no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is inclined to allow the revision thereby, setting aside the impugned order dated 15.09.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.3244 of 2025 by the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the order dated 15.09.2025, passed in Crl.M.P.No. 3244 of 2025 by the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, is hereby set aside and the vehicle viz., Two Wheeler KTM Duke bearing Registration No.TN 39 DE 7143, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concerned Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai;

(b) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle before the learned Principal Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai. If the original RC Book is in the custody of the finance company, the petitioner shall produce a photocopy of the RC Book, along with an affidavit stating that the original is with the finance company and a letter from the finance company acknowledging such custody.

(c) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent/

authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future, failing which the respondent/trial Court is at liberty to confiscate the vehicle;

(d) The petitioner shall not alienate and shall not make any alteration in the vehicle;

(e) The pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top