Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. Maria Clete, J
Ashwanth R T – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Patil – Respondent
A.No.5999 of 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs.B.Mahalakshmi for M/s.Sudha Ramalingam
For the Respondents: Mrs.P.Veena Suresh (1836/2002)

Withdrawal of aversive petition in matters involving custody and guardian appointment.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the O.P. filed under Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, r/w. Order XXI, Rules 2, 3 and Letters Patent Clause 17, praying for the appointment of the petitioner as guardian and permanent custody of the child. The application is granted.

Table of Content
1. permission to withdraw petition and dismissal as withdrawn. (Para 1 , 2)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Original Petition stating that the petitioner wants to withdraw this Original Petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Accordingly, this Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected application is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASA.D. Maria Clete, JAshwanth R T – AppellantVersusSonia Patil – RespondentA.No.5999 of 2024

Withdrawal of aversive petition in matters involving custody and guardian appointment.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. Maria Clete, J
Ashwanth R T – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Patil – Respondent
A.No.5999 of 2024