Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
Sindhiya Mircaulin – Appellant
Versus
Sakthi Mareeswaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of matrimonial dispute and parties' residence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's reasoning and guiding precedent on wife. (Para 6) |
| 3. outcome and transfer directions following wife. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.107 of 2025 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sattur, and transfer the same to the file of the Principal Family Court, Trichy.
2. Despite service of notice on the respondent as well as on the counsel appearing for the respondent before the trial Court, the respondent has not turned up. Even today, there is no representation for the respondent.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
4. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 15.09.2024 as per the Hindu Rites and Customs and due to their wedlock, they were blessed with male child now aged 10 months and that subsequently there arose some misunderstanding and they are living separately. It is also not in dispute that the respondent filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.107 of 2025 seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sattu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
