Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G. Arul Murugan, J
MANIKANDAN VATHAN – Appellant
Versus
Anonymous officers(s) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged registry's anonymous defects list. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. registry entitled to raise maintainability queries before numbering. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petition dismissed as not maintainable and frivolous. (Para 8) |
For Mr.V.Vasanthakumar Respondent(s): Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)
The writ petition has been listed under the caption “for maintainability”.
2. The petitioner/party-in-person has preferred the writ petition seeking for the following relief:-
“Kind issuance of appropriate writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, etc., to (1) identify the anonymous official(s) who sabotaged the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.516/2026 and, daringly passed the anonymous order in Diary No.64545/26 (2) quash the said anonymous order as being tantamount to a failure of constitutional Machinery in the High Court Administration (3) direct appropriate action against the said anonymous official(s) for the 7 counts of sabotage of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order and for the 6 counts of fraud and deceit, and (4) ban issuance of such anonymous orders which are aimed at preventing litigants from fil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
