Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
MOHANA – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ seeks registration based on possession. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. patta alone cannot enable registration. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. liberty granted to approach civil court. (Para 7) |
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to register the General Power of Attorney dated 12.02.2026 presented by the writ petitioner for registration which was kept pending as Document No. P/Kinathukadavu/183/2026 and release the document to the writ petitioner within the time frame to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to register the General Power of Attorney, dated 12.02.2026, presented by the writ petitioner for registration which was kept pending as Document No.P/Kinathukadavu/183/2026 and release the document to the writ petitioner within a time frame.
2.The petitioner states that her husband Rajavel had 1/7th share in the lands measuring an extent of 117 sq.m. comprised in Survey No.1090/19; 869 sq.m. comprised in Survey No.1111/1; 124 sq.m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
