SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41257

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
N.RANGANATHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE MEMBER SECRETARY(MS) – Respondent
WP No. 17563 of 2026 | WP No. 17567 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Selvam
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar

Court directs authorities to consider representations for shop allotments and pass orders within stipulated time.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Facts of the Case: Petitioners, engaged in vegetable business, seek direction to authorities for issuance of application forms for allotment of vacant shops following their representation and payment of fees. Respondents are officials of Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority responsible for such allotments.

Findings of Court:
Court finds merit in petitioners' limited relief request and directs respondents to consider their representation and pass appropriate orders.

Issues: Whether the court should direct the respondents to consider petitioners' representation for allotment of shops.

Ratio Decidendi: In cases seeking issuance of application forms for tender processes, courts may direct authorities to consider representations and pass orders within specified time frames.

Result: Writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the 3rd respondent to consider petitioners' representation and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. petitioners request court direction for consideration of shop allotment application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties agree to limited court direction for authority review. (Para 3)
3. court issues direction for timely consideration and disposes cases. (Para 5)

COMMON ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to issue application form to the petitioners for allotment of 72 vacant shops on rental basis in Vegetable, Fruit, Flower and Food Grain Market on monthly rent basis at Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai-600107 based on the petitioners’ representation dated 25.04.2026 by receiving the demand drafts dated 22.04.2026 for sum of Rs.1000/- drawn in favour of the

1st respondent.

2.The petitioners state that they are doing vegetable business. Recently, the respondents/CMDA have issued a public notice intimating the tender-cum- auction for allotment of 72 vacant shops on rental basis in Vegetable, Fruit, Flower and Food Grain Market on monthly rent basis at Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai-600107. It is the case of the petitioners that they have made payment and drawn demand draft for a sum of Rs.1,000/- on 22.04.2026 in favour of the 1st respondent. When the petitioners approached the 3rd respondent on 22.04.2026 along with the demand draft for issuance of application form for the tender-cum-auction, the 3rd respondent refused to issue the same for the reasons best known to him. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation, dated 25.04.2026, to the respondents to issue application form to the petitioners. Since the same did not evoke any response, the petitioners have come forward with this writ petition.

3.Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it would suffice if this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 25.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders within a specific time frame. 4.Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the respondents, would submit that the 3rd respondent will consider the petitioners’ representation and pass orders on merits within a period of six weeks.

5.In view of the limited nature of relief now sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioners’ representation, dated 25.04.2026, and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity to the petitioners, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top