IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
C.Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to refusal of document registration. (Para 1) |
| 2. registration allowed with undertaking if land not being converted. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. writ allowed subject to filing of affidavits and payment of duties. (Para 4) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip. The document is refused registration under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, on the ground that the property is conveyed as a residential plot or for residential use without approval from the planning authority to convert the site into a residential one. In this case, the petitioner contends that the land is conveyed as such, without changing its use.
2. In such cases, the matter is no longer res-integra and is governed by the Judgement of this Court in Sankarakumar & another - Vs- The Sub-Registrar, Panpozhi (W.P.(MD) No.29522 of 2025). This Court considered the purport of Section 22-A (2), the need to balance the Constitutional Right of the owners of the property under Article 300-A with the enforcement of development control legislation and the rules framed thereunder. It held that, irrespective of the location of the land, if the executant and the claimant of the docum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.