Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of vague allegations and limitation bar (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. scope of inherent jurisdiction and assessment of allegations (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. limitation bar and abuse of process (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. fir quashed due to procedural lapse (Para 14) |
Order
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in Crime No.213 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same.
2. The petitioner is arrayed as A5 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 341, 325 and 506(i) of theIndian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 02.06.2015 at about 09.30 hours, when the defacto complainant was passing near Kuttaikarai, the petitioner, along with other accused, assaulted the defacto complainant and threatened him to withdraw the case earlier filed against the accused. Based on the said complaint, the present FIR came to be registered.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the allegations made in the complaint are vague and general in nature and no specific overt act has been attributed to the petitioner.
5. The learned counsel would further contend that the alleged offences are punish
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
