Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V. Thamilselvi, J
S.Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
K.R.Suresh Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil revision petition filed to set aside trial court order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner seeks to reopen evidence for examining witnesses (Para 3) |
| 3. sufficient opportunity must be granted to prove the case (Para 5) |
| 4. civil revision petition is allowed (Para 6) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 07.01.2026 passed in IA No.5 of 2025 in OS No.230 of 2017 by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Ponneri.
2. The petitioner herein filed in IA No.5 of 2025 in OS No.230 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Ponneri, under Section 151 CPC, seeking to reopen the plaintiff’s side evidence and to produce further Pws. Upon hearing both sides the Trial Court dismissed the application stating that the petitioner has filed this application in order to drag on the suit proceedings.
Challenging the same, the petitioner filed this Civil Revision Petition.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner has filed I.A No. 4 of 2023 seeking to reopen the petitioner’s side evidence and the same was allowed with cost. However, due to misunderstanding with previous counse
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
