IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Mala, J
Silambarasan – Appellant
Versus
Hasina Begum – Respondent
CMP No. 11420 of 2026 | CRP No. 2759 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. execution proceedings status and outcome (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal consequence of closed execution (Para 4) |
Order
Mr.K.V.Babu, learned counsel accepting notice on behalf of the respondent, submitted that he undertakes to file vakalat before the Registry.
2.The learned counsel for the respondent also produced the Daily Status of the proceedings in EP.No.1/2022 and submitted that the delivery was effected, recorded and the EP was closed as early as on 06.04.2026 and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the Civil Revision Petition. 3.From a reading of the Daily Status of the proceedings in EP.No.1/2022, it appears that the delivery warrant was executed, the petition mentioned property was handed over to the petitioner and the delivery was effected. Even the stay petition filed by the third party, was returned and the EP was closed on
06.04.2026, recording delivery.
4.In view of the fact that the Execution Proceedings was closed, recording delivery, as early as on 06.04.2026, this Court finds that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.
5.Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.