IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ
Shanmugavel – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
(Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.)
The petitioner is the detenu viz.,Shanmugavel S/o.Karunakaran aged about 21 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in Cr.M.P.No.106/2025 dated 30.11.2025 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. Apart from the other grounds that were raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel submitted that the detaining authority was aware of the fact that as on the date of passing of the detention order, no bail application was pending. However, the detaining authority took into consideration the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.3714 of 2025 dated 04.09.2025 and came to the conclusion that bail has been granted in the similar case and therefore, there is likelihood of the detenu coming out on bail. The learned counsel submitted that the order that was relied upon by the detaining authority is not a similar case. Therefore, the de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.