SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41453

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shah, J
Shalini – Appellant
Versus
Ajithkumar – Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition



In matrimonial transfer petitions, wife's convenience is a cardinal principle to be weighed while exercising jurisdiction under Section 24 CPC.

Headnote:The petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeks transfer of a divorce petition from the Family Court, Sivagangai to the Family Court, Karur. The marriage was solemnized on 09.06.2023 and the parties are living separately. The respondent filed a divorce petition (H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2025) at Sivagangai, while the petitioner filed a restitution petition (H.M.O.P.No.425 of 2025) and a Domestic Violence case (D.V.C.No.24 of 2025) at Karur. The petitioner resides at Karur with their female child and faces difficulty attending hearings in Sivagangai. The court relied on N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha (2022 Live Law (SC) 627) and held that wife's convenience must be considered in transfer petitions. The petition is allowed and the case is transferred to the Family Court, Karur. The court directs the Family Court, Sivagangai to transmit the records within 10 days.

Table of Content
1. facts of matrimonial dispute and pending cases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reliance on supreme court precedent. (Para 4 , 5)
3. transfer ordered in favour of wife. (Para 6 , 7)

O R D E R

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2025 from the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai and transfer the same to the Family Court, Karur.

2. It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 09.06.2023 as per Hindu rites and customs and due to their wed-lock they were blessed with a female child and that subsequently, there arose some misunderstanding between them and they are living separately.

3. It is also not in dispute that the respondent has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2025, seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai and the petitioner has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.425 of 2025 seeking restitution of conjugal rights and the same is pending on the file of the Family Court, Karur and that the petitioner has also initiated the proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act and the same is pending in D.V.C.No.24 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court , Karur. He would further submit that the petitioner is residing at Karur along with her female child and finds it very difficult to travel to Sivagangai to attend all the hearings.

4. Despite the receipt of Court notice as well as private notice the respondent has not turned up. Even today, there is no represented for the respondent.

5. In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder :

“The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed.”

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is residing at Karur, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, the petition in H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2025, is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai and transfer the same to the Family Court, Karur. The learned Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2025 to the file of the Family Court, Karur, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Judge, Family Court Karur, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

7. With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top