Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41461

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
Kantha – Appellant
Versus
The State of TamilNadu – Respondent
Writ Petition

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy
For the Respondents: Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Ms.Sithara Sarangan

Courts are empowered to direct corrections to clerical errors in judicial records to ensure accuracy and fairness in proceedings.

Headnote:Paragraph 1: The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Third Respondent to transfer 1.41 Acres of land to SIDCO based on proceedings dated 27.02.1984, and further directing the Fifth Respondent to transfer the industrial shed allotted to the petitioner in Survey No. 401 and 402. Paragraph 2: The petition was listed under the caption "For Being Mentioned" to correct clerical errors in the appearance portion of the earlier order dated 07.04.2026, specifically the name and pronoun used for the learned counsel for the Fifth Respondent. Paragraph 3: The Registry is directed to carry out the corrections requested by the Fifth Respondent's counsel and issue a fresh order copy, ensuring that paragraph 3 of the prior order reflects the correct gender pronoun and counsel name.

Table of Content
1. petition filed for land transfer and listed for mention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. directions issued for land transfer and order disposed. (Para 5)

PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to transfer the land of 1.41 Acres to SIDCO based on the proceedings in Ni. Mu. 8395 / 81-T1 dated 27.02.1984, and directing the 5th respondent to transfer the land area of the shed No. 3 allotted to the eptitioner for Industrial Establishments in Survey No. 401 and 402 situated at Chettikarai Panchayat, Dharmapuri District within a reasonable time, on merts For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1, 3, 4, 6 & 7 R2 – No appearance Mr.Sitharai Sarangan, for R5

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the 3^rd respondent to transfer the land of 1.41 Acres to SIDCO based on the proceedings in Ni. Mu. 8395 / 81-T1 dated 27.02.1984, and directing the 5^th respondent to transfer the land area of the shed No. 3 allotted to the petitioner for Industrial Establishments in Survey No. 401 and 402 situated at Chettikarai Panchayat, Dharmapuri District.

2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the 5^th respondent would submit that at present, the petitioner is in possession of the Shed No.3 and once the entire land is re-classified, certainly, the subject land will be transferred to the petitioner. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate order.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the 5^th respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

5. The submission made by the learned counsel for the 5^th respondent is hereby recorded. Once after the completion of re-classification of land, the 3^rd respondent shall transfer the subject Shed No.3 to 5^th respondent. Subsequently, 5^th respondent shall transfer the said Shed No.3 to the petitioner. Till then, the peaceful possession of the petitioner shall not be disturbed.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 41461

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASKrishnan Ramasamy, JKantha – AppellantVersusThe State of TamilNadu – RespondentWrit Petition

Courts are empowered to direct corrections to clerical errors in judicial records to ensure accuracy and fairness in proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
Kantha – Appellant
Versus
The State of TamilNadu – Respondent
Writ Petition