Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G. ARUL MURUGAN, J
Catholics Fraternity Awakening Society – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges revisional order rejecting unauthorized construction revision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. proceedings initiated under planning legislation and revision rejected (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. locus standi absent and writ petition dismissed (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R1 to R8 No Appearance for R9 & R10 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)
Heard.
2. The writ petition has been filed assailing the order of the
2nd respondent dated 14.11.2025 in No.6353017/UD4(L.Re-2)/2023-4.
3. The petitioner/party-in-person submitted that, the order of the 2nd respondent is not in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] and also further steps have not been taken by the enforcement authorities.
4. The authorities had initiated proceedings under Sections 56 and 57 of the Act, in respect of the Church constructed by the respondents 9 and 10. Notices were issued calling for approved plan and inspection, followed by notice in Form-III to discontinue the usage of the building. The Church had filed statutory revision before the Government
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
