IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, K.K. Ramakrishnan, JJ
Nattardevi – Appellant
Versus
The Home Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ordinary leave requires minimum sentence period; emergency leave may be considered (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
[Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.]
This Writ Petition has been filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 21.04.2026, wherein the petitioner has sought for grant of ordinary leave for her father, who is serving sentence at Central Prison, Palayamkottai.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced a copy of the proceedings dated 29.04.2026 issued by the second respondent. It is seen that the representation has been rejected on the ground that the convict has not satisfied the minimum period required for granting ordinary leave. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the convict has undergone sentence for 2 years, 10 months and 28 days.
Therefore, he is not entitled for grant of ordinary leave.
3. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned proceedings of the second respondent and the same is perfectly in line with the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.