Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
P.Periyasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of employment history and non-inclusion of past services for pension. (Para 3) |
| 2. division bench decision recognizes counting of pre-regularization service for pension. (Para 4) |
| 3. direction to revise pension proposal taking into account entire service. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
Heard Mr.S.Visvalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was initially appointed as Thalayari and served as such from 20.05.1992 to 31.05.1995. Thereafter, he was absorbed in the regular time scale of pay as Village Assistant with effect from 01.06.1995 in terms of G.O.(Perm) No.625, Revenue Department, dated 06.07.1995 and continued as such till 18.02.2020. Thereafter, the petitioner was promoted as Office Assistant through proceedings dated 17.02.2020. Subsequently, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation and retired from service on 30.06.2020. However, the services rendered by the petitioner as Village Assistant from 01.06.1995 to 18.02.2020 and as Of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
