Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummini Sudheer Kumar, J
G.Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secreta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner service history and pension claim background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior court ruling covers petitioner's case. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court directs respondents to process revised pension. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
Heard Mr.S.Visvalingam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was initially appointed as Thalayari and served as such from 22.07.1987 to 31.05.1995. Thereafter, he was absorbed in the regular time scale of pay as Village Assistant with effect from 01.06.1995 in terms of G.O.(Perm) No.625, Revenue Department, dated 06.07.1995 and continued as such till 07.01.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner was promoted as Village Administrative Officer through proceedings dated 03.01.2019. Subsequently, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation and retired from service on 31.07.2023. However, the pension was fixed without taking into consideration the service rendered by the petitioner as Village Assistant from 01.06.1995 to 07.01.2019. Hence, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
